By Karel Bergmann
MAY 13, 2016
Giro d’Italia Stage 9 Preview
Stage 9 of the 2016 Giro d’Italia will be a very interesting stage from a strategic perspective. Normally, pro cycling time trials are of one of three flavours:
- – Short and technical. This is typical of many prologue time trials. They tend to be quite short (under 12km), and wind through city streets. The Giro’s first stage is a prime example of such a TT. These types of races tend to favour athletes with big power, which can accelerate back up to speed out of all of the corners.
- – Long and debilitating. Stage 5 of the 2012 Tour of California is a prime example of such a race – 30km, pan flat, out and back. These are a master class in suffering – it tests the athletes’ ability hold the power down while maintaining as aero a position as possible.
- – Uphill. Don’t worry, the Giro has one of these on tap as well in stage 15. These kinds of TT’s have to be evaluated to see if they are so steep that aerodynamic concessions should be made to reduce rider-bike weight. When they are, you’ll often see riders race these on regular road bikes due to the weight advantage and better climbing position than on a full-aero TT rig. Such time trials become a game of raw power-to-weight ratio, and the willingness to push yourself.
Interestingly, stage 9 doesn’t fit into any of these categories. Being here in Italy, I was fortunate enough to be able ride the stage days before the pros. Stage 9 is actually predominantly downhill, punctuated by a few short climbs. To make things more interesting, the course is extremely technical in nature with many tight turns and winding descents. To do well, a rider and their bike will have the following characteristics:
- Very aero – the more aero you are, the faster you will go down the less technical parts of the descents.
- Wide gear ratio – you’ll want a really big, big gear so that you can keep the power down, even though you’re descending. You’ll also need a gear easy enough that you can hit the climbs at your ideal cadence.
- Ability to recover – the course has 3 or 4 climbs on it. You need to be able go fast on the descents, but also recover enough that you can hit the climbs HARD.
- Homework – the winner will have done their homework. This is not a TT you can ride blind – there are many very high-speed corners that you can’t see around. If you know what to expect, you can keep rolling through some of them. If you don’t know what to expect and don’t have a death wish, then you’ll have to hit the brakes through these.
- Take risks – there’s a lot time that can be made on this course if you’re bold given its high-speed, twisting nature. The speed makes it risky though. To do well, the rider has to be comfortable on their TT rig, and 4), have done their homework.
I decided to have a go myself, so I parked at the finish, and thought the ride to the start would be a good warm-up. 30km and almost 1000m of climbing later (!!!), I arrived at the start line in Radda in Chianti, a good deal more tired than I had anticipated (there’s very little easy riding in Tuscany I found). As I rode, I could feel that the trip to the start was holding my legs back from hitting their full potential, but it is what it is. As with stage 1, I rode Merckx style: A TT bike would have been nice, but the last thing I want is to be transporting 2 bikes with me when I travel!
Two things held me back – I got stuck behind some traffic on a descent, and I dropped a chain. Since my friend, Murphy was with me; the chain flew straight through the chain catcher and into the BB (this has happened to me before, why do I never learn?). It took a little while to extricate the chain and get back up and running. I posted my ride on Strava: https://www.strava.com/activities/571532690
Despite the approximately 2 minutes of lost time, and sub-optimal equipment, I was shocked to find that I’d managed 9th on the segment. I have a feeling that might not stand up on Sunday though.
MAY 6, 2016
My ride was nothing spectacular. If I pro-rate my pace to go the entire distance, I would have finished in 15:15, which is approximately 2 minutes slower than the slowest pro, and approximately 4 minutes slower than the fastest one.
MAY 5, 2016
Greetings from Apeldoorn (host town for the first three stages of the Giro).
We have nine super-talented riders here ready to tear it up:
- – Marcel Kittel – targeting sprint stages
- – Bob Jungles – Targeting a high GC position, so he’ll be looking to give it everything on Friday’s TT
- – Fabio Sabatini
- – Matteo Trentin
- – Gianluca Brambilla
- – Carlos Verona
- – David De La Cruz
- – Pieter Serry
- – Lukas Wisniowski
Their #1 bikes (race bike and TT bike) are equipped with dual-sided PRECISION power meter pro units.
I’m personally very interested to see how things progress as we’ll have nearly 21 consecutive days of racing on tap, with the same riders and the same hardware though probably the most demanding of the Grand Tours.
The picture above shows the amount of hardware required to support 9 riders through a Grand Tour. Each rider has a TT bike, a spare TT bike, a race bike, and at least one spare race bike.
Tomorrow, I’ll head to the start of the TT course. I’m hoping to do a hot lap on the course and give you an idea of how fast a mere mortal goes and compare to the pros.
Stay tuned and wish me luck!
Karel is a 4iiii product manager who’s been currently mandated with one task: to ensure Team Etixx – Quick-Step gains the greatest value from riding with PRECISION power meters. When our PhD Computer Scientist is not on the road supporting the world’s most decorated cycling team, he’s a Cat 2 rider in his home of Calgary, Alberta. Karel will periodically share his Tour adventures. You can read more of his stories at 4iiii.com and send him questions at firstname.lastname@example.org.